Talk:Crossbone Isle (Golden Sun)
Isle = Cave?
You know how Anemos Sanctum and Anemos Inner Sanctum get separate articles? Well, the "dungeon" area of Crossbone Isle is referred to as Crossbone Isle Cave. Does that mean it should get a separate article? Just thought I should bring this up. The world's hungriest paperweight 15:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm... I believe/I conclude/I assume we can keep Crossbone Isle unified and the Anemos Sanctum pages separate based on storyline importance. While CI's just some treasure island with some giant ghost dude in it, AS' connections with Contigo itself and probably the ancient culture of Anemos run deep. Also, AS is where Hammet got his gold from before leaving for Angara to found Kalay. So, there's more material to work with to fill up two separate pages effectively. Erik Jensen (Appreciate me here!) 17:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oh and also, the first screen featuring puzzle-like areas right outside the cave entrance is just "Crossbone Isle". ^_^ Erik Jensen (Appreciate me here!)
Glitch
You know how the Tempest Lizard's tornado is semi-transparent? Well, if you check the Djinn menu and then go back, the tornado will now be opaque!
Dark Dawn
Maybe it would be less hassle to read if there were two Crossbone Isle articles. One for DD and one for GS. Its a long aricle as it is and DD's CI is much different than GS. Just a thought Chinkycandie 00:24, 16 March 2011 (CDT)
- I think they should be divided into separate pages for those reasons too. Erik the Appreciator 00:39, 16 March 2011 (CDT)
- Makes sense to me. But the next question we have to ask is: Should Crossbone Isle become disambiguous or redirect to one of the two articles? The World's Hungriest Paperweight 10:33, 16 March 2011 (CDT)
- I think disambiguous, because I envision the names to be Crossbone Isle (Golden Sun) and Crossbone Isle (Golden Sun: Dark Dawn). We do the same with Dragon Shield. Erik the Appreciator 11:53, 16 March 2011 (CDT)
- That's about what I figured, but that brings up another point I wanted to discuss on the TLA Dragon Shield talk page: Do we really need to use the entire game's name in the article's title? I, personally, would like to avoid unnecessarily long titles, so Crossbone Isle (Dark Dawn) would work just as well. The World's Hungriest Paperweight 12:45, 16 March 2011 (CDT)
- I suppose it could be shortened like that. Erik the Appreciator 13:59, 16 March 2011 (CDT)
- That's about what I figured, but that brings up another point I wanted to discuss on the TLA Dragon Shield talk page: Do we really need to use the entire game's name in the article's title? I, personally, would like to avoid unnecessarily long titles, so Crossbone Isle (Dark Dawn) would work just as well. The World's Hungriest Paperweight 12:45, 16 March 2011 (CDT)
- I think disambiguous, because I envision the names to be Crossbone Isle (Golden Sun) and Crossbone Isle (Golden Sun: Dark Dawn). We do the same with Dragon Shield. Erik the Appreciator 11:53, 16 March 2011 (CDT)
- Makes sense to me. But the next question we have to ask is: Should Crossbone Isle become disambiguous or redirect to one of the two articles? The World's Hungriest Paperweight 10:33, 16 March 2011 (CDT)
Sounds good to me :) I'll probably contribute the walkthrough XD Chinkycandie 18:29, 16 March 2011 (CDT)
