Talk:Red Demon enemy line
Merge Aka Manah line with this Article
Copied from the Aka Manah discussion.
It's come to my attention that the Demons of Dark Dawn are really a fusion of this monster line and the Red Demon monster line from TLA, rather than just an extension of the Red Demon line. While the weakenesses reflect the Red Demon line, the names include an ArcDemon amongst them – which is the Japanese name of the unused Aeshma; furthermore, the DD Demons inherited their monster design from the Aka Manah line (they look far more like the Aka Manah and the Druj than the Red Demon, Lesser Demon, and Mad Demon. As further evidence, the Red Demon line use entirely Venus-based tactics, highlighting their Vital Moon technique. However, while the Curse Demon, Mad Demon, and Fury Demon indeed, do, have a similar move, Vital Barrage (and while I haven't checked it, I wouldn't be surprised if they had the same Japanese name for the techniques), all three DD Demons have Demon Eye, a move that solely belonged to the Aka Manah line, and the later two Demons have Mercury Psynergy from the Cool series, a la the Akah Manah and Druj. All these points suggest that the two Demon enemy lines were merged into one Demon line; suggestive of the removal of Red Demon, Lesser Demon, Bull Demon/Aka Manah, and Master Demon/Druj, in favour of just Demon, followed by Mad Demon, followed by ArcDemon/Aeshma. So my point then would be to merge the Aka Manah line in with the Demon article. Does that make sense? Marandahir (talk) 16:38, 19 February 2013 (CST)
- A la the Aka Manah enemy line page discussion, Erik and I agree that this article, the Demon enemy line, needs to be split into a Lesser Demon enemy line and a Curse Demon enemy line. The Curse Demon enemy line is a spiritual successor to both Aka Manah enemy line and the Lesser Demon enemy line. Marandahir (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2013 (CST)
- I guess I should do that, though are you sure it should be "Lesser" and not "Red"? We do use "Blue Dragon enemy line", after all... Erik the Appreciator (talk) 20:11, 19 February 2013 (CST)