Template talk:Class series

...

Let's discuss this

I really feel this needs to be rearranged with Samarai and White Mage in their own catagory. What should it be called.Tzion 14:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Uh, I dunno - it looks like it always involves three elements, so I'd just put those two there. Erik Jensen ^{(Appreciate me here!)} 17:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

In that case do we really need two double element categories --Tzion 00:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Hmm... I doubt it'd hurt to merge those. Erik Jensen ^{(Appreciate me here!)} 02:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

I think we should shorten this

Seeing as we have merged all the Mono-elemental class series pages with the same name, do we really need to separate the GBA and DD classes on the template. I think that, since half the classes overlap anyways, separating them just takes up space. Tzion 15:25, 17 February 2011 (CST)

I guess that makes sense. When I merged the two templates, my logic was that there are enough mono-classes unique to the GBA games and DD that some people might want them separated. But if you think they should be together, I'm fine with that too. The World's Hungriest Paperweight 10:38, 18 February 2011 (CST)

To me, it makes sense to separate them, how about.. we do this like we have done other templates. with sub sections starting "GBA:" and "DS:" within the mono elemental list. This would make it a little less tall, and give separation between the games.~ dkpat 16:30, 18 February 2011 (CST)