Category talk:Candidates for deletion

Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labeled for deletion.

User:E Master500
The user page I added was blanked by the author. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 15:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, umm, I think we're only supposed to start talking here if we disagree with it being deleted. Ah well, I don't really care. All that guy ever did was edit his user page a couple of times, and it wasn't anything to write home about (although I do think it could be a little rude to just nominate someone's user page for deletion, even under the circumstances, but like I said I really don't care). Anyways, I doubt we'll be seeing him around anytime soon. Oh, and welcome to GSU, Clarinet! The world&#39;s hungriest paperweight 16:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Pokemon Jupiter Version
We really need to start enforcing some sort of fanon/fandom policy on this site. I think we're being a little to forgiving on some pages. Anyways, I nominated this page for deletion because of the obvious.Zabbeth 20:00, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You can be certain I'd delete any junk and vandal pages like that whenever I glance at this site and its Recent Changes. That misguided page aside, though, can you explain what pages on this wiki you're talking about as being "a little too forgiving" with the fanon/fandom content? Erik Jensen (Appreciate me here!) 21:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Garet's Kitchen
 * Golden Sun Odyssey
 * Golden Sun Syndicate
 * The Adepts of Weyard

And that's just some of them. It's all fanon/fandom. The only one I don't really have a problem with is Temple of Kraden, and that's because the person who created that site is also responsble for creating this site, I think, wasn't it Draco? Anyways, I thought fanon/fandom was not allowed on wikis. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be an ass about this but we do need to uphold the rules don't we? But who am I to talk, there's a rule against walkthroughs but I through a bunch in on their respective pages and nobody had a problem with them. I think I just confused myself, my mind's kind of in a jumble now. Anyways, I think I got my point across.Zabbeth 21:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I think Draco was only the first GSU user to be awarded Bureaucratship after somebody else did the actual starting of the wiki. Anyway, I'm led to believe that Wikia wikis in general have some degree of liberty over fanon-based content in their articles. I've looked and found that Wookiepedia the Star Wars wiki has an article on the fansite TheForce.net, while Bulbapedia the Pokemon wiki has an article on the fansite Serebii.net. Which means I think the "rules" technically don't prevent us from having those fansite pages there. (Though it might be worth considering merging all those pages into a List of GS Fansites or something...) Erik Jensen (Appreciate me here!) 22:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Actually there is a List of Golden Sun fansites, which is where I found all these pages. What we could do is delete the fansite articles and convert the list page into a page of URLs leading to their respective sites. Sound good?Zabbeth 14:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah sure, though I'll make sure it's not just a list of URLs and make a short description of each site on the page, of course. ^_^ Erik Jensen (Appreciate me here!) 22:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

List of Djinn
Ok, I totally understand why the article was selected for deletion, but I only started it because I saw that it was requested.

I would still say that it's useful to have a list all in one place and it certainly isn't hurting anything. Jozcoz 15:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

True but we do already have have this template.

Which in it self is kind of a list of Djinn. Either way I do not have final say, Erik will attend to this when he gets here.Zabbeth 15:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but there's also details of where they can be found, what they do in battle... This could potentially become a highly detailed article Jozcoz 16:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thing is, the details of where they can be found and what they do in battle are already in detailed lists of the Djinn of each element: List of Venus Djinn, List of Mars Djinn, List of Jupiter Djinn, and List of Mercury Djinn, and each of those pages are plenty large by themselves already. Don't forget Golden Sun DS coming up, also; it might have a lot of new Djinn, and they would further add to and develop the four lists of Djinn by elements into even larger articles. It's for that reason that merging the four articles into one master list would make the page unnecessarily huge, the way I see it. The only thing that needs work right now, then, is the Djinn article itself and how it links to the four lists of Djinn by element. Erik Jensen (Appreciate me here!) 17:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

List of Djinn
Yes, but there's also details of where they can be found, what they do in battle...

This could potentially become a highly detailed article Jozcoz 16:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

True but we also already have this, this, this, and this. Putting all that info on one page would be way too much for one article. Plus with GSDS coming it could possibley grow to an undesirable size and create one big cluttered mess.Zabbeth 16:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * ...Hot diggity, Zabbeth. You just read my mind. O_O Erik Jensen (Appreciate me here!) 17:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)