Talk:Angara/Dark Dawn

The following conversation was moved here from Talk:Angara (Dark Dawn):

Just as a heads-up, I'm going to start working on a merge between this page and the main Angara article. After all, there really isn't any reason to have separate articles, or at least no reasons that can't also be handled by sub-pages. And besides, this article was originally a rushed copy-and-paste job by some random IP. Afterwards, I'll see what I can do on merging the three Weyard articles (which may be the main reason this page was created in the first place). The World&#39;s Hungriest Paperweight 15:15, 10 October 2011 (CDT)
 * Three Weyard articles? You mean you're counting the ancient past article as part of that? I would've actually argued for that particular article to stay separate because it'd be useful as a compendium on all insights into the past that the current three games have provided. Merging the random Dark Dawn versions of Angara and Weyard's pages into their base articles is needed because those are both "present-day", as opposed to the one that's specifically about the past. Erik the Appreciator 17:02, 10 October 2011 (CDT)


 * I think that the DD Weyard was created because of the ancient past article. If you really wan't to keep it separate, we'd better come up with a different name, such as "History of Weyard". Or we could make it a sub-page of the Weyard article, but that might not be much better than simply merging it. Anyways, Angara is my main concern right now, so we don't need to make a decision right away. The World&#39;s Hungriest Paperweight 18:07, 10 October 2011 (CDT)
 * Yeah, sure, nothing wrong with a different name. Erik the Appreciator 20:14, 10 October 2011 (CDT)