Talk:The Building Blocks of Reality

For some reason, I feel like the contents of this page could be merged into the pages on the elements, and a bit to the page on Psynergy. Comments? &mdash;Hinoa talk.un
 * Well, the tone of this page is like an analytical essay and not like a standard-tone article. An interesting idea, then, is to make this a sub-page of the Alchemy article. Put /The Building Blocks of Reality into Alchemy and it will link to a new subpage of the article with that name, and move this page's contents there. (This is what you wanted with the Wheat Sword FAQ a while back.) That way, the articles with their verifiable content are up front while more theoretical content like this can be viewed as a link from the articles. Essays like this I think can be useful for the site, but since it's not verifiable, it shouldn't occupy the space of an article. Erik Jensen (Appreciate me here!) 19:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

This is what we like to call, depending on the group, either fanwanking, theorycrafting, devving, or plotting. Perhaps making a "speculative" tag and template might be in order? I'm slightly amused, and very impressed at the thoughtfulness, but here it is and there's the formatting begging to be fixed. (you and me both, Kyarorain). AlishaShatogi 04:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I like Alisha's suggestion. This really doesn't sound like an article, but I wouldn't exclude it either. Maybe a separate category for theoretical content is in order, and other articles can point other readers to essays(for lack of a better word) like this and offer up the theories to them.Resolver 05:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

What is this page exactly? I've just been hitting "random page" and stumbled across it, and it's... Umm. Well I don't really know what to think XD (I'm probably just going to ignore it, but it certainly raised an eyebrow XD) Slax01 06:30, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
 * Uh... You're certainly right to think like that. I'd redirect it to Alchemy. Erik Jensen (Appreciate me here!) 06:36, October 2, 2009 (UTC)